Olympics: Phelps Double Counting and Phony Medals

No one can say that Michael Phelps is not a great swimmer. But best Olympian ever? The fact is Phelps basically does two events, but gets eight medals out of it. He sets world records while winning, but so does nearly every other gold-medal swimmer. It's a function of technology: the new swimsuits and the faster pool:

Here are Phelps's races-- basically the 100 and 200 meter freestyle or butterfly four times over:

1. 100-meter butterfly: Phelps swims 100 meters using the butterfly stroke (a stupid stroke, which no one would swim if the goal was to get across water)

2. 400 freestyle relay: Phelps swims 100 meters freestyle

3. 400 individual medley: Phelps swims 100 meters butterfly and 100 meters breastsroke; with two other strokes

4. 200 butterfly: same as 1 and 3, only longer

5. 200 freestyle: same as 2, only longer

6. 200 individual medley: butterfly and freestyle, with backstroke and breaststroke tacked on

7. 800 freestyle relay: same as 4

8. 400 medley relay: Phelps swims 100 meters butterfly, same as 1

Three of the medals are in relays, so he is down to five. (Spitz won relays, too, as did Carl Lewis, but only one.) Really Phelps deserve three medals: the 100 meter butterfly, 200 meter butterfly and 200 meter freestyle. He is not the best at anything else. As for the medleys, no other sport has them. Indeed no other sport has strokes. (Who invented the butterfly?) It's as if Usain Bolt was entered in the 100 meters-while-waiving plus the straight 100 meters.

This double counting is especially annoying given the presence of the dolphin kinc, which is used in every race regardless of stroke. On the initial dive and with every turn, the swimmers abandon the assigned stroke and scurry under the water. As the announcers made clear, Phelps gets a tremendous advantage from the dolphin kick. Maybe they should add that stroke.

Elliot Spitzer is right: This is a private matter

The criminal complaint charging members of the now-famous Emperor’s Club prostitution ring does not charge Gov. Spitzer with anything. It doesn’t even name him. (See http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/nyregion/20080310spitzer-complaint.pdf) That means that someone leaked confidential grand jury material to the Times. This happens all the time. But the fact remains that the information was supposed to be private. I don’t think Spitzer is even a hypocrite. Did he ever prosecute clients of prostitutes? This is no different from the Lewinsky mess. I hope, like President Clinton, he fights and doesn’t resign.